I found it interesting that while the Underdogs could definitely fall under the canopy of naturalist literature, Azuelas still used a lot of very modern devices. For example, he changes tenses often when he steps outside the narrative to almost describe the character's motives and explain what is going on or give backstory. The way he did this once or twice in every chapter gave the novel an interesting flow. The perspectives shifted around quite a bit from Demetrio to Luis to the Federal officer and a few other characters. Hearing these different perspectives seems very important to studying and understanding any political uprising or war. I think the change of perspectives also helps us remember that in a war not only are all sides guilty of horrors but each person also has a story and a family and some innocence.
Loss of idealism and innocence is also a big themes in Underdogs. There is a very clear shift from part one to part two. By part two, Demetrio and his men have already started to lose the meaning of the revolution. Demetrio is seduced by power and success and his men have started looting and destroying the villages they pass through. At the beginning they saw the civilians as their own people but now they kill them for sport and rape their daughters. They have become all that they hated before in the Federales. Luis seems to be the only one who objects to their new habits, but only because it will give them a bad reputation, not because it goes against what they used to believe in- the revolution for the very people they have begun to terrorize.
By part three, Demetrio's inner circle is made up mostly of ex-Federales. He has turned into a war machine and the revolution has burned everything in its wake. The village people look at the soldiers with disdain and every man has been made to choose a side- there are no peaceful men left, Demetrio says, only Federales, revolutionaries, and deserters. And though the men have plenty of bills and gold in their pockets, the land is torn apart and there is no food for them to buy with all their money. They began to fight to save their land and their peaceful way of life but they have, in the end, destroyed it.
In the last few pages Demetrio is reunited with his wife and his son (who no longer recognizes him). When she asks him why he is still fighting, he tosses a rock over the side of the canyon and says "Look at the rock, how nothin' can stop it now..."
Other points:
- I thought it was interesting how both Demetrio's group and the Federales at least once, referred to the other as "dogs down below"
- Also, the way Azuelas describes the setting in this novel is so beautiful and rich. Every time they are in the Sierra, everything is described as blue, and as soon as they move to meet the rest of the revolutionary groups and invade the first town full of Federales everything is gray or white and smokey. In the last few pages Demetrio notices the sapphire mountain tops, but the second to last paragraph they are covered in white. "The Sierra is dressed in gala. Above its inaccessible peaks, a pure white fog descends like a snowy veil on a bride's head."
- Captain Solis is sort of the sage of the revolutionary army. He sees what the war is doing to the country and the people, but he is dismissed by Luis and the others as an idiot
- I noticed the ciccadas at the very beginning of the novel and again at the very end. Maybe they are a symbol for how the people of Mexico feel in the midst of the war and the pulling apart of their land- like helpless buzzing insects. They could also be a symbol of nature and consistency in the Sierra even after all the fighting.
I think this post is full of interesting comments. Regarding language, there is, however, something appropriate with it reminding you of Texas, since there is are cultural and geographical links between Mexico and Texas. Also, I agree that there are surprisingly modernist aspects to Azuela's writings. In fact, some have compared him to Hemingway.
ReplyDelete